[Mailmunge] Grief After OS Update

Dianne Skoll dianne at skollsoft.com
Thu Oct 17 14:08:27 EDT 2024


On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:51:35 -0400
list--- via Mailmunge <mailmunge at lists.mailmunge.org> wrote:

> > You'll lose a bit of performance

> What are we talking about? Like instead of 8ms it might take 15ms? Or
> more substantial? Like you wont notice unless your processing
> hundreds+ per minute?

I don't know.  I haven't tested it to find out.  I don't think scan
times will be affected much, but starting up a new worker is likely to
be much slower because instead of just a fork(), it will involve a
fork() and an execve() of Perl.

I'd say that unless you're processing 50+ messages per minute, it won't
really matter.

> > (Of course, depending on your filter, you might need to update any
> > Perl modules that aren't packaged by the OS.)

> What do you mean by this. Are you saying if our own code relies on a
> perl lib? Or do you mean that a package manager update of perl might
> not update everything mailmunge would need?

What I mean is this: If *your* filter code happens to rely on a Perl
module that wasn't packaged with the OS and that has a component
written in C, you'll run into the same issue.

The standard Mailmunge code shouldn't rely on anything that isn't
shipped with most Linux distros.

Regards,

Dianne.


More information about the Mailmunge mailing list